|
Post by arewelost on Nov 18, 2024 14:27:16 GMT 10
Do you remember the "art work" where a banana was taped to the wall as the exhibit and someone ate the banana. It was called "Comedian".
Now, the concept is being auctioned, expecting to bring over $1M.
An Assistant Professor at Columbia University School of Arts said ....
"It would be hard to come up with a better, simple symbol of global trade and all of its exploitations than the banana,"
Personally, I thought the juxtaposition of the duct tape over the banana highlighted the adhesive power of minimalism and the simplicity of life against the prophetic growth in capitalistic enthusiam where propensity wanes.
|
|
|
Post by nobodyhere on Nov 18, 2024 15:10:56 GMT 10
An artistic critique by Copilot (AI):
Maurizio Cattelan’s "Comedian" is a piece that transcends traditional artistic boundaries, creating a provocative dialogue between art and society. The simplicity of the banana, an everyday object, juxtaposed with the harsh, industrial aesthetic of duct tape, raises questions about the nature of art itself.
At first glance, the piece may appear as an absurdist prank, yet it cleverly engages with the viewer’s expectations and perceptions. By elevating a perishable fruit to the status of high art, Cattelan challenges the conventional notions of value and permanence in the art world. The ephemeral nature of the banana contrasts starkly with the longevity typically associated with fine art, thus inviting discourse on the temporality of existence and the fleeting nature of consumer culture.
The work’s placement—literally taped to a pristine gallery wall—further emphasizes its thematic resonance. It is a commentary on commodification, both in art and in life, as the banana, an object of daily consumption, is suddenly transformed into a commodity worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. This paradoxical valuation highlights the often arbitrary and capricious nature of market-driven art economies.
Cattelan’s "Comedian" also operates as a meta-critique of the art industry itself, humorously reflecting on its tendencies toward sensationalism and its susceptibility to spectacle. The piece forces viewers to confront their own relationship with art: Is the value found in the object, the idea, or the reaction it provokes? By prompting such introspection, "Comedian" successfully blurs the lines between art, performance, and social commentary.
In essence, "Comedian" is not just about the banana or the duct tape; it’s about the conversations it sparks, the discomfort it causes, and the boundaries it pushes. It’s a reminder that art can be found in the mundane, and that sometimes, the simplest gestures can provoke the most profound reflections.
|
|
|
Post by arewelost on Nov 18, 2024 15:28:01 GMT 10
After reading Copilot's interpretation, I disagree, but with the realisation of the impact on subconscious thought invoked by that interpretation, I have also revised my opinion of its meaning. Now I believe it is better described as ...
A treatise on a methodology through an amalgamation of preventative stratagems and techniques to disincentivise consumption of comestibles, thus precluding simian behavioural norms from assimilating and illicitly appropriating gustatory provisions. Or to put it more simply "How to prevent your pet monkey from eating your lunch".
|
|
|
Post by yobarr on Nov 18, 2024 15:43:32 GMT 10
After reading Copilot's interpretation, I disagree, but with the realisation of the impact on subconscious thought invoked by that interpretation, I have also revised my opinion of its meaning. Now I believe it is better described as ... A treatise on a methodology through an amalgamation of preventative stratagems and techniques to disincentivise consumption of comestibles, thus precluding simian behavioural norms from assimilating and illicitly appropriating gustatory provisions. Or to put it more simply "How to prevent your pet monkey from eating your lunch". My thoughts exactly, Steve, and succinctly expressed. Seems that great minds think alike?
|
|
|
Post by nobodyhere on Nov 18, 2024 17:39:28 GMT 10
|
|
|
Post by peter57 on Nov 18, 2024 18:35:00 GMT 10
Jeezuz H Ke Riest 4yr old pre schoolers come up with better shit than this duct tape banana. This conversation reminds me of a gaggle of wine tasters.
|
|
rgren2
Junior Member
Posts: 88
|
Post by rgren2 on Nov 18, 2024 19:08:30 GMT 10
Tax write off. I read an article on how it’s done.
|
|
|
Post by nobodyhere on Nov 19, 2024 5:55:43 GMT 10
I always thought that the art world was full of pretentious wankers, and perhaps it's no accident that the banana looks like a bent phallus.
|
|
|
Post by nobodyhere on Nov 19, 2024 11:50:20 GMT 10
I suppose that means that the insured value would be 0.
|
|
|
Post by Mike Harding on Nov 19, 2024 14:03:36 GMT 10
Over the years I have had discussions with artistic friends during which they turned very angry when I pushed the question "What is art?" Because it's my contention that if one cannot define it then one has no idea what it is.
I never received an answer I found satisfactory rather many assertions that I was a barbarian who understood nothing....
|
|
|
Post by nobodyhere on Nov 19, 2024 14:19:40 GMT 10
I may not know what art is, but I know what it isn't. And it sure as hell isn't a piece of fruit taped to a wall.
|
|
|
Post by magnarc on Nov 20, 2024 8:59:49 GMT 10
Methinks art, like beauty, is in the eyes of the beholder. It will sell no doubt. There is always someone with more money that sense.
|
|
|
Post by peter57 on Nov 20, 2024 18:18:36 GMT 10
For crying out loud they were selling paintings painted by, wait for it, ELEPHANTS. Sold at Christies Auction House for tens of thousands, and if you believe some of the reports, hundreds of thousands. Perhaps out of gratitude they should have given the Elephant a banana minus the duct tape.
|
|
rgren2
Junior Member
Posts: 88
|
Post by rgren2 on Nov 21, 2024 11:46:49 GMT 10
Hunter Biden is a renowned artist (cough, cough) and his paintings sell for big $’s.
|
|